The hole keira knightley, kellie picklers new song, tynisha keli misunderstood,

Pregalathan · Guest

I would do nothing.
Landaumanuk - I would feel retarded if I bought a house knowing that all the other houses in the area have the same lock/key and I didn't change mine so anyone could come in that has the default key. You know, like the people who kept their iphones with the default password that everyone knows. I do like how you think the default password is strong though.Like what theonlywizdum said, I would be grateful if I was that retarded that the only thing they did was to leave a note.

Hubel · Guest

“I'm going to say something pretty radical: Capitalism cannot work for our society going into the future.In latest past "recession" (2nd Republican Great Depression), we picked up a 9% increase in productivity in the past year."Productivity" is working longer, or doing more for less, or replacing a worker with a robot. The efficiency of Computers has more or less been fully dredged, and most of that is offshoring jobs to cheaper workers while the company has the same output.Other than green technology -- the jobs are not coming back. Do you have a degree in nanotechnology? Are you good at robotics repair? We are already designing devices that can build models at home with a CAD program, some lasers controlled by printer engines, and a tank of plastic or sugar -- in ten years, you will have automated FABs that can create small items -- only limited by copyrights.If you took away Oxley Sarbanes and obscure accounting procedures that were lobbied for by large corporations seeking to create barriers to entry -- you'd lose a million jobs at least. Jobs created to keep people busy. Without the war on drugs; 3 million. Without a War on people in the way of oil and gas pipelines in Iraq and Afghanistan -- likely another 3 million. There are jobs that do nothing for productivity, that an "efficient" society, would not have. We would be entirely better off if those people got paid and just stayed home; less carbon created, less death, more time with the family building happier kids.I'd say half the jobs are make-work. I'm in financial services -- a field that would not exist if our government looked out for the people. We get all these products -- because we are afraid what will happen if we get sick, retire broke, die and leave family, lose a job. Most people, didn't dream of saving receipts, filling out forms correctly and standing in line. It's a very profitable venture that does not create more efficiency, better products or a happier world.So as robotics and artificial intelligence improve -- how many low skill jobs like house painter, floor sweeper and ditch digger will be replaced? You gain one robot repairman and lose twenty labor jobs.The future is either a dystopian nightmare of make-work bureaucracy, or we realize that we all just don't need to work, don't need to arrest pot smokers, don't need to believe that they hate us for our freedoms when we have a military base supporting a government that boils people alive if they get out of line.The "Leisure Society" where we quit worrying about some poor schlepp is not working every hour of the day, and start looking at how the elite game the system is an alternative. We however, are trained that it's all about efficiency, and that wealth is merit. We worry about pennies to the poor when 90% of Medicaid fraud is conducted by too big to fail health conglomerates because Pfizer buys adds on CNN -- you don't know that.

Spatcher · Guest

Blueish people?.
leave those stress relieve centers alone. They are doing a great service to Americans.!

Parmeley · Guest

or maybe "he ***** her brains out"??
I've been complaining about this for a while now - politics shouldn't be a team sport. Believe what you believe and vote for the people that come closest to those beliefs regardless of party affiliation.The only time I stray from that is in that I tend to only vote for people that have an actual chance of winning. If there is a guy in the primaries that I agree with 75% and one that I believe in 90%, but the 90% guy is a horrible public speaker, looks funny, and has some personal issues that will make him hard to get elected, then I'll vote for the 75% guy instead. This seems disingenuous to some people, but I'd rather have a good bet on 75% than a bad bet on 90% because the losing bet will give me the guy that I believe in like 5%...which isn't exactly a win for me.All that being said, I've only ever voted democratic, but that is because there hasn't been a viable 3rd party option that is more liberal than the Democrats.

Elie · Guest

They should make a Farscape MMO.

Gynelle · Guest

You mean like this? http://scoutmaster.typepad.com/photos/uncategorize ...

Unikrishnam · Guest

uhhh, did you NOT see the missing eye?

Kamris · Guest

!

keli stewart archives