Dont get marriage mel gibson it just a mistake, sexy megan fox stripping, michael j fox death,

Srishti · Guest

*Waits eagerly for Det. John Mayer and Det. Fat Black Guy to arrest David Letterman followed by inspiring speech from TV lawyer on Paternalism in the Workplace*/s
A friend of mine celebrates "conception week" to bug their parents...

Tukela · Guest

“For anybody interested, I found this forum that has a lot of good app suggestions for Android. So for those new Android users like me, this will come in handy. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=4 ...

Kamris · Guest

This is not a Venn diagram..
Same here. It shouldn't be about Bush vs Obama. Anyway, it's good to see a Republican without the lockstep bullsh!t at a time like this, even though she & I have gone all caps at each other several times. :-)!

NYLAY · Guest

lulz mark hamill=les than spectacular actor. he made a good whiny guy in star wars, though?
Oh, yeah. Oooh, ahhh, thatâ€™s how it always starts. Then later thereâ€™s running and.... screaming.

Jack Martin · Guest

"Its ***** vicious and does not belong on a sports field."I agree. Wait, by Its you mean women in general right?

Teresa · Guest

When did this trending thing start? I think it's kinda a bad idea. Not because it's annoying (Which it vaguely is, but to get seriously annoyed by something inconsequential like that is just silly) but because it won't give an accurate portrayal of whether or not people like an article.Look at it this way: Right now, there's a lot of blind diggers out there. People who digg based just on the headline/description. This is a serious problem, since it can cause horribly written articles to hit FP simply because the premise is good, and it also shifts the focus from the article to the submitter, which very well could be one of the causes of the poweruser phenomenon. Blind digging was a big enough problem before this change.Now, this trend thing comes along, and places a time limit on people. This makes it so people are even less likely to read through the article than before, because they're afraid the time limit will run out. Of course, we all know there's no penalty for not voting on a digg trend article, but there's a psychological effect when we know there's a time limit. People see the time limit, and out of fear of it, they compulsively hit the 'digg' button.Then there's the people who hate the digg trends so much, they rebel by burying any and all digg trend items. It's a ridiculous way to react, yes, but that's just how people are.I suggest letting people opt out of it, like sewalsh said, and making the time limit less prominent/imposing. It's a good basic idea (one of digg's biggest faults is that it takes a lot of time to hit front page) but it needs some tweaking.EDIT: See, people are already rebelling by burying. Told ya so.

Dalreen · Guest

No, but the jerk store called and they're running out of you

Lohithan · Guest

!

michael douglas movies