megan fox fake pics :: meryl streep roles |
Author |
Message |
Neilson
Guest
|
Posted: 10 16 2009 Post subject: meryl streep 1960s |
|
|
You might want to stop praying to the Government:"New single-family home sales fell 3.6 percent " (in September)http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091028/bs_nm/us_usa_e ...
were slaves used in the construction? probably.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Leanna
Guest
|
Posted: 10 15 2009 Post subject: megan fox superman nipples |
|
|
“Terrific. Now I can be sure that my watch is as accurate as can be. *Follows Big Ben Clock because the word bong is amusing.*
|
|
Back to top |
|
Diyaksha
Guest
|
Posted: 10 14 2009 Post subject: Online casinos free play |
|
|
And like every other article related to the economy...Everyone's suddenly an economist....Except for the part where nobody knows anything about economics..
Did you stop and punch her right in the face?!
|
|
Back to top |
|
Kristofiak
Guest
|
Posted: 10 12 2009 Post subject: megan fox superman nipples |
|
|
And where does it end? Then, everyone’s doin’ it. It’s like the wave at ball games. Air quotes. The phrase, "Don’t go there." - Someone’s gotta take a stand!?
Obviously it had enough viewers? Where are yu getting that assumption from?the show lost MILLIONS ofdolalrs a year. IT was very expensive to produce compared to a normal sitcom due to its large cast and single camera/movie style filming method, comapred to the live on tape method. And its ratings were abysmal. It did not have a lot of fans. and as much as people want to fool themselves otherwise, it was NOT able to keep fans it had. It lost fans every single season. And in first half of htefirst season, it lost fans EVERY SINGLE SHOW! Not an exaggeration. Every single episode had lower ratings than the week before. Yet peoplestill claimed that everyone who watched the show was hooked for life. (Which would mean the ratings would ALWAYS increase...which is just the opposite of reality.) |
|
Back to top |
|
Cindie
Guest
|
Posted: 10 11 2009 Post subject: melissa rycroft new boy friend |
|
|
Let them leave, good riddance!
|
|
Back to top |
|
Abby
Guest
|
Posted: 10 10 2009 Post subject: sexy photos of megan fox |
|
|
It was never exactly clear when Sauron first gave the Nazguls their winged mounts. In the book, the first one was spotted while the Fellowship was rowing down the river. The previous times, the Nazgul were seen only on horses. I guess Sauron could have decided to give them winged transport after their failed attacks on Frodo at Weathertop and outside Rivendell but its probably more likely that Sauron always had them but for some reason or another, the Nazgul decided not to use them. The Witchking comes in on a horse when he lead his armies through Minis Tirith's gate. I guess a winged mount was unfeasible for that situation. Maybe the other Nazgul had decided that the winged mounts were not necessary at first for following a lone hobbit traveling on foot.
|
|
Back to top |
|
Magaris
Guest
|
Posted: 09 12 2009 Post subject: michael douglas demi moore disclosure |
|
|
NEVER GONNA LET YOU DOWN!
|
|
Back to top |
|
Cecca
Guest
|
Posted: 09 09 2009 Post subject: megan fox superman nipples |
|
|
!
|
|
Back to top |
|
Tippit
Guest
|
When I first heard the title of this movie, I thought it was dealing with something baaaaaaad. Nice to see it's not dealing with beastiality. |
Back to top |
|
|
|
9 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 40 Anonymous Users) |
|
|
|