Megan fox topless pics, meryl streep television interviews angels in america, meryl streep home birth,

Vongher · Guest

Interesting. I think I get who the agent is, but who is the principal?If people paid their own way to go to college, then I think this economic issue would hold true. The issue is that college isn't there to serve the needs of the supposed "customers". It is there to serve the needs of "society" (taxpayers in the form of politicians and grant boards, major donations, corporations for research grants, etc.)
Good point. The Droid looks great and there is much hype but it is unproven.

Pitbull · Guest

“I agree. I believe there is a reason for his insanity. People that might be leaning towards that direction, are scared off when they see the nut jobs. The Teabaggers are a perfect example, you don't want to go join in the marches for fear you will be considered a rightwing extremists. The End the Fed marches don't get any publicity or they will show the couple a people who are destroying property. Beck is putting the icing on the cake. Reeling the sheep back to the middle, towards complacency.

Shanequa · Guest

dugg for kung flu.
I'll go with skztr's idea posted above. Keep the immunity from being sued, lifting that immunity would lead to every single defendant filing suit against the prosecutors just to distract them from their job. It would also cost us as tax payers way more money dealing with all the extra lawsuits. On the other hand, there is no way we should continue to allow for immunity from having criminal charges filed for criminal acts.!

Ohlmus · Guest

Re: "The review goes a bit further and points out that, to account for all the possible issues, a fully relativistic MOND hypothesis must be derivedâ€”for MOND, or any new theory of gravity, to be taken seriously it must contain, as a subset, Einstein's theory of general relativity."And this is precisely where they consistently go wrong. If you're going to go out of your way to consider MOND, then why constrain your investigation to MOND theories which only support Relativity? Why do they not also revisit the Dayton Miller experiment that generated a non-null result for an aether drift? Given the precision of electronics today, it would make a lot of sense to try to replicate Miller's experiment with a non-hostile, open mind. The simple explanation for why this is not being done pertains to the continuing heresy associated with questioning strongly entrenched, long-held, established views pertaining to Einstein. Some physics textbooks go so far as to claim that people who believe in Dayton Miller's aether experiments are quacks, even as quantum physicists publish press releases explaining that they can light a light bulb with "energy from the vacuum". The arguments supposedly disqualifying the aether were in fact incredibly weak. Even Einstein himself held out for a replication of Miller's aether drag experiment. But ultimately, Einstein's followers would decide not to follow up on that successful experiment, instead declaring that the aether was dead in a research review paper. Nowadays, Einstein's followers eagerly ridicule the notion of a unified field theory (like an Electrically Modified Newtonian Dynamics, aka EMOND). They fail to acknowledge that Einstein himself came up with the idea. The history of science is not always a straight, narrow, forged path lacking erroneous diversions.It's really too bad that the physics establishment does not take a hard, introspective look at itself. Many great ideas are being disqualified from funding purely because of their potential for disproving the prior work of established physicists. It won't be until physicists learn to be more honest with themselves that the answers to the hardest questions mankind has ever asked will reveal themselves. Peer review is really nothing more than a group of men. It is not impervious to mistake -- even, in some instances, dramatic mistakes that have persisted for a hundred years. The history of science records many similar mistakes. Just because we have cellphones and computers now does not mean that we are now impervious to similar errors.?
I'm no soccer expert, but I'm guessing that by-the-hair takedowns aren't really "part of the game."

KUNAL · Guest

yea, seems pretty certian that this bill is going to be found unconstitutional...

Zoey · Guest

Apparently he had a bit of an awakening after he sat on a toilet and broke it - he then realized that he was tubtastic and reformed the old fashioned way with diet and exercise. Wait, that was Kevin Smith. No clue, probably coke.

Altise · Guest

cow and cheeken? ...COW AND CHEEKEN?***** YOU COW! ***** AYOU CHEEKEN!

CpnHowdie · Guest

!

melanie griffith playboy nude