Megan fox blowjob pics, hottest megan fox pics, michael j fox org,

Sree · Guest

I have a dream:I want to go to a tupperware party where they sell prostitutes instead of tupperware.
No way I'm gonna be a Donor.See, if there's a lack of donor's, a lot of rich people are going to fund research that goes into artificial organ making and cloning for extra organs and stuff.... or they're gonna kill hobo's. Anyway, you being a donor might put a stop to our dystopian cyberpunk future, I hate you.

Krisha · Guest

“What a stupid reason for an article.

Srikanya · Guest

THEY'RE DEAD..
It's astonishing to me that the latter half of 2009 hasn't been filled with 20th anniversary retrospectives of the momentous events of 2009. With a media that's list-happy, this history has been relegated to almost a side-note. I remember when the Wall came down very clearly; I was at my desk at work when the news came in. I'd been in East Berlin in '87 and then returned in '90 and even in those three years the change was so enormous I'll never forget it.!

Avery · Guest

Sponsored by Sony Pictures?
Did you fail out of 20th Century American History? When it comes to the economy, Hoover : FDR :: Bush : Obama. FDR's running mate accused Hoover of "leading the country down the path to socialism." Rexford Guy Tugwell, one of the chief architects of the New Deal, said, â€œWe didnâ€™t admit it at the time, but practically the whole New Deal was extrapolated from programs that Hoover started.â€Hoover signed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, which should be enough by itself to dispel this myth of Hoover as an advocate of laissez-faire. On top of this, Hoover pressured businesses into keeping wages artificially high. In addition, he signed the Revenue Act of 1932, which doubled the income tax. There are a host of other examples of Hoover's economic interventions just a google search away; but please, don't let little things like facts and history get in the way of your comforting myths.

Naaisha · Guest

The thing that does crack me up about Digg is the sense that those who disagree with the ideals of the Democratic Party are "bad people" who should be exposed, while those who stood against the Conservatives of the last regime were Patriots doing what they thought was right. Why can't someone vote against a Democratic ideal and simply be a decent person with a difference in philosophy? Why are they "evil" or "traitors to their constituents"? People assume they must be voting on some sort of personal agenda. Maybe they saw details in this draft of the legislation that disturbed them enough to vote no ( forcing everyone to purchase healthcare, for example) , even if they agreed with the basic principle. There are pro-choice, moderate, Republicans out there, why can't there be honest, decent Democrats who simply hold a fundamental belief that no person should be forced to purchase healthcare? It's not always black and white, good and evil. Sometimes people just disagree......

Gaurav garg · Guest

Here's her letter to Obamahttp://www.more.com/2027/9521-president-obama-shou ...

Vernalisa · Guest

This is a good move. I have went back to using gmail as main client now.

Tukela · Guest

!

jennifers body megan fox